Taos Hum Mysterious low frequency hum

Residents in Britain and parts of the southwestern United States have subsisted complaining of an infuriating buzz that continues to persist at this time. Furthermore, researchers have not been able to determine its origin. Not all individuals can hear the low-pitched hum, other than those who say it appears simulated in nature.

In 1977, a UK newspaper received almost 800 correspondence from people complaining of loss of sleep, light dizziness, shortness of breath, headache, malaise, bad mood, poor health, inability to read or study due to continuous hum. The best known in the United States is the “Taos Hum”. There, the annoyance was so severe for the “listeners” in Taos, United States, that they coordinated and called on Congress to investigate the issue and help them determine the origins of the sound. However, no definitive sources were discovered, a widely held assumption that the hum is produced by a military communications device used to communicate with submarines.

Most listeners talk about sound that starts quickly, never diminishes, makes sleep difficult, and is more apparent inside a home or motor vehicle than outside. Some characterize it as a sound similar to a diesel engine idling in the distance. Since it has not been corroborated by microphones or very low frequency antennas, its origin and nature are, however, an enigma.

In 1997, Congress guided researchers and commentators from some of the nation’s most esteemed research institutions to investigate a curious low-frequency “Taos Hum” heard by residents of and around the small town of Taos. New Mexico. For years, those who had heard the sound, often characterized by them as a “buzz”, had been searching for solutions. No one was sure when it started, but its continuation initially led a handful of participants and then many of those who heard it (‘listeners’) to join.

The Research Congress convened included an alignment of around 12 researchers from various scientific organizations. Joe Mullins of the New Mexico Academy and Horace Poteet of Sandia National Labs composed the team’s final story. Other New Mexico research associations that participated included the Phillips Air Force Research Laboratory and the Los Alamos National Research Laboratory. Listeners’ apprehension that the buzzing could have been produced by the Defense Department ensured that the investigation was handled openly and that a considerable number of people were contacted.

The initial objective of the research team was to establish a dialogue with the listeners in order to try to decide the disposition of the hum, the noise it caused, its frequency, programming and effects on those who perceived it. Following this, the team intended to survey the inhabitants of Taos and neighboring districts to decide how widely distributed the drone was present. Finally, the team would try to isolate and decide the source of the noise. Significant to their attempt was the obvious benefit to the group in deciding the source of the occurrence, rather than examining the existence of the noise. There was a widely evident understanding on the part of the researchers that something was happening, but precisely what appeared to be a challenged interpretation.

The primary research focused on 10 listeners and decided to define crucial details surrounding the noise. He was persistent, it was cataloged by only a small number of people and the noise was very low in the frequency range between 30 and 80Hz. There was variety in the way that various listeners detected the noise, with some hearing a noise like that of a low-reverb truck engine, while others perceived a more constant, pulsing, yet still low noise. Interestingly, the researchers found that the noise was not limited to the region around Taos, but was actually heard in various places in the state, as well as around the world.

Listeners characterized the increasing difficulties they were having with noise. Based on the stories and complaints that had brought the issue to Congress in the first place, listeners specified noise as a source not only of aggravation, but also of light dizziness, insomnia or sleep interference, ear constriction, pain in the head. and nosebleeds. The listeners were also disturbed by the unsettling nature of his livelihood, it did not seem normal to them.

According to the Informal Taos Hum Investigation Report published on August 23, 1993, most listeners initially experienced the noise with a sudden onset, as if something had simply been turned on. Several of the listeners inferred that there was an association between the noise, military units in and near New Mexico, plus that the hum was somehow produced by the extremely low frequency locations of the United States Navy in the region. Northern Michigan. These suggestions led to a non-military presence on the investigation team.

After studying 10 listeners, the group that now included James Kelly, a hearing exam scientist at the New Mexico Institute Health Sciences Center, began a comprehensive survey of Taos locals. Their survey of 1,440 residents led the team to assume that approximately 2% of Taos residents were listeners. In view of this large number of listeners, early examination of the noise source focused on rare opportunities for the generation of low-frequency noise. While there were hearing outliers within the low frequency range recognized by listeners, these evaluations did not show a coherent background sound that could well have explained the noise. As Mullins and Kelly deduced, “there were no known acoustic signals that could explain the noise, nor were there any seismic occurrences that could describe it.”

Having ruled out extraneous origins, the team concentrated on examining the listeners’ inner ears and analyzing the frequency response. Although these studies are not complete, it seems highly unlikely that the noise is generated by low frequency tinnitus as some have contemplated. Mullins and Kelly are more likely to support that listeners have developed a particular responsiveness to noises in the 20 to 100 Hz range and are therefore directing their research to compiling an idea of ​​how the ear detects activity. low frequency.

While this work may improve the response to the persistent noise source problem, Dr. Nick Begich and Patrick Flanagan have investigated an additional perspective. Dr. Nick Begich has some interesting insights in Mullins ‘own comments that could infer another origin from the listeners’ unmatched sensitivity, and possibly in the long run, a result of his almost exhausting misfortune. To encourage prospects for his research, Mullins has indicated that, as a society, “we are constantly building the background of electronic noise and progressively moving toward wireless or wireless belongings, all electromagnetic transmitters.” If that’s the cause of the noise, we don’t understand it, but we can’t rule it out. ‘

Begich speculates that the source of the noise may be discovered within this accumulation of electromagnetic background.

He argues that there is an apparatus for tone transduction that could explain noise. Crucial information may be hidden in a technology discovered by Dr. Patrick Flanagan. Neurophonic sound technologies were advanced and established on the basis of conducting noise transmission using distinctive “hearing” pathways to the mind. Average symptomatic and noise assessment apparatus would be unproductive in detecting the origins of ‘sounds’.

Patrick Flanagan’s neurophone, conceived when Flanagan was fourteen, is a low-voltage, high-frequency, amplitude-modulated radio oscillator. In clearer terms, the neurophone acts on the listener’s skin by transforming ‘modified radio waves into a modulated neural signal that bypasses the eighth cranial auditory neuron and immediately communicates information to the research cores of the mind. In other words, the neurophone allows the listener to ‘hear’ without having to exercise the ear canal or the bones and nerves that we normally contemplate with hearing.

Flanagan’s license was certified after a 6-year battle with the patent office that resulted in an evaluation of the device on a hard-of-hearing patent office worker. The screen persuaded the patent tester that the Neurophone worked, even though it seemed to work against conventional concepts, of how we perceive noise. The novel idea of ​​the Neurophone is that we use the skin itself as a neuronal transmitter.
In fact, this idea is quite simple. When in a woman’s womb, the skin of the fetus functions as the main sensory receptor. From this the eyes, nose and ears evolve. While the ears specialize in listening, Flanagan identified that the skin is also an organ. As a result, if a path could be established to transfer data through the skin to the mind, then the data could be instantly transmitted to the mind, avoiding the ears.

The neurophone inserted radio waves between two small electrodes placed on the skin and mainly used existing neural tracts to instantly access the mind. Flanagan and Begich theorize that the neurophone could be pulsed at frequencies recognized by listeners interrogated by Mullins and the research group. If the noise was caused by ambient electromagnetic areas, Neurophone technology may be used to muffle it. As Mullins examines the ear canal and our human hearing devices, Flanagan and Begich conceive that the solution is more likely to be established through the tracts demonstrated by the neurophone, which bypass the ear altogether.

The evidence of whether or not your hypothesis is accurate depends on the examination of the listeners. If Begich and Flanagan are accurate, neurophonic technology and what has been widely read about hearing can be used successfully to lessen listeners’ distress as the search for the source of noise continues unabated.